I am reading a book where it talks about programming and brainwashing and it was talking about how everyone has been programmed. I thought that was a rather odd statement, but when it went on to detail what the programming is, it became rather clear about how we're all programmed to think in a certain way.
The way we are programmed is to be focused on our own person. We focus on our safety, our sports teams, our lifestyle, our religion and even our families and friends among many other things.
Now there's nothing really wrong with that, but the problem is that if that's our only focus, we're really not seeing the global problems that trickle down to our lives. In order to see these things, you have to move from the self to a greater existence. In other words, your thinking must go from "I" to "we", from "we" to "us" and from "us" to "all".
We are kept in those lower perspectives, pulling from "us" until it's just "I". That thinking is everywhere and is all over your tv, but if you're not looking for that, you'll never see it.
Now the quantum world has this concept that was previously talked about here, called quantum entanglement. Or as Einstein put it: spooky action at a distance. This little concept is the nuclear bomb of perception shifts. Knowing the results of quantum entanglement shows that there's no such thing as the self, as all things are mysteriously and miraculously interconnected. (See the movie "I Am" as quantum entanglement is explained perfectly)
The post about the double slit experiment also comes into play, because it talks about passive observation versus active observation. In the programming, individuals are in a passive state. Shifting from the programming requires a movement from passive to the active state in order to identify the programming.
Active state observation is another name for critical analysis. This is one of those aspects that the education system fails to work on. A fully functional student with critical analysis is one that provides ideas and logical arguments that help better explain why one thing is true while another is false.
It can't be said that things happening all around the world don't factor into our existence. It's known the entanglement exists, so those entanglements will affect everyone whether things are good OR bad. Individuals who are programmed would not see these attachments, and as a result be unable to be affected by the seemingly unrelated events. However the truth is that the individuals are affected and as a result are numbed to their effects by the programming.
Break the programming, look at the world as just one thing, then think of the solar system as one, think of the galaxy as one, and then see the universe as one... and then keep going. Seriously, keep going!
Religions have been teaching us to look at each other as part of the entanglement, but the institution of religion has built in a program that takes you away from the connections. This is an argument for another day, but look at your own faith through the critical eyes of analysis to see that the universal message is there, but it's appealing to a self-focused existence. You can't connect to your source (whatever you want to call it, most call it God) through your self. You must view the entire existence as if you were the source.
I am not asking you to become source, I am only asking you join with the source. See everything from the perspective of source.
Source might not be the best word here, but there's not one word that is going to explain it quite right.
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
Friday, June 1, 2012
Do ghosts hang out at cemeteries or not?
Depends on who you ask.
One claim is that ghosts in cemeteries are not possible because nobody has actually died at a cemetery or lived at a cemetery. Valid point.
The other claim is that the spirit is attracted to its respective physical body. This is of course, valid as well.
So when one cemetery like Bachelor's Grove in Midlothian IL is labeled the most haunted cemetery, is it because of the connection the spirit has to the physical?
Or how can you explain it away after saying ghosts don't hang out at cemeteries?
Truth is you can't, or at least you shouldn't. Unless you've been there and can prove scientifically without any question, you can't prove either statement to be true. Or alternatively, you'll find that in a double blind case study that both conclusions are true.
This is a rather convoluted dichotomy when it comes to paranormal investigation. It really depends on which argument you're taking. Skeptic's aren't likely to prove ghosts exist while at the same time, ghost hunters aren't willing to stop and say ghosts don't exist.
The real problem with it all, is that ghosts and cemeteries are an impossible paradox of belief and science that neither comes to a definitive conclusion. In theory all locations are haunted by spirits and ghosts really don't exist.
The way to look at this, which is what I am doing with my team, is to treat it as a simple harmless fun outing. We go to a cemetery, we check it out. We try out our little gadgety things and see if anything happens.
Did we find anything? Doesn't matter!
Did we have fun? Ah, now we're getting somewhere!
Did we make any friends? I would like to hope so! This is what I think the main reason why anyone should ghost hunt a cemetery should be about.
These are public locations. We treat them with respect and they become a fabulous place to visit and hey, maybe there is a spirit there. A spirit of joy and friendship!
disclaimer: My group (zero point quantum paranormal) does not charge anyone for going to any of our outings. If we do have a charge it is that those items will be stated clearly as a part of signing up (and is usually someone else that is actually getting paid). Besides, who charges for going to a free public place anyway?
One claim is that ghosts in cemeteries are not possible because nobody has actually died at a cemetery or lived at a cemetery. Valid point.
The other claim is that the spirit is attracted to its respective physical body. This is of course, valid as well.
So when one cemetery like Bachelor's Grove in Midlothian IL is labeled the most haunted cemetery, is it because of the connection the spirit has to the physical?
Or how can you explain it away after saying ghosts don't hang out at cemeteries?
Truth is you can't, or at least you shouldn't. Unless you've been there and can prove scientifically without any question, you can't prove either statement to be true. Or alternatively, you'll find that in a double blind case study that both conclusions are true.
This is a rather convoluted dichotomy when it comes to paranormal investigation. It really depends on which argument you're taking. Skeptic's aren't likely to prove ghosts exist while at the same time, ghost hunters aren't willing to stop and say ghosts don't exist.
The real problem with it all, is that ghosts and cemeteries are an impossible paradox of belief and science that neither comes to a definitive conclusion. In theory all locations are haunted by spirits and ghosts really don't exist.
The way to look at this, which is what I am doing with my team, is to treat it as a simple harmless fun outing. We go to a cemetery, we check it out. We try out our little gadgety things and see if anything happens.
Did we find anything? Doesn't matter!
Did we have fun? Ah, now we're getting somewhere!
Did we make any friends? I would like to hope so! This is what I think the main reason why anyone should ghost hunt a cemetery should be about.
These are public locations. We treat them with respect and they become a fabulous place to visit and hey, maybe there is a spirit there. A spirit of joy and friendship!
disclaimer: My group (zero point quantum paranormal) does not charge anyone for going to any of our outings. If we do have a charge it is that those items will be stated clearly as a part of signing up (and is usually someone else that is actually getting paid). Besides, who charges for going to a free public place anyway?
So I created a paranormal group part 2.
Intent is the name of the game. What you intend to have happen is something that's set in motion.
With intent, I set upon achieving one simple little goal that should be a part of every single organization in existence.
That one goal is to make sure people are happy.
Happy's a pretty big goal. I think if you give people happiness that it in turn makes you happy just from their happiness.
I've been reading "The Children of The Law of One" by John Peniel. If you've ever studied Edgar Cayce's readings, you've probably heard about this guy.
Anyway, I am getting to the part where it talks about intent and happiness and achieving enlightenment.
The statement says basically that once you've achieved enlightenment you pretty much spend the rest of the time helping others to achieve it.
Now I KNOW I am not fully enlightened. I have frustration that meets me in some form every day. Whether it is my work, or the fact that I sense spirits who can't properly communicate me, I am frustrated.
At times I feel like Prometheus trying to steal fire from Zeus. I want to know what the little secret is, and then turn it around and give it to others.
This is not all that far from one's whose enlightened, but in some regard I would have to be happy about it all.
Sometimes I would say that I am not happy. It's not an "incredible hulk" kind of unhappy, just a "bridge is out" kind of state of upset.
I mean, what are you going to do with things out of your control? You going to let those things eat at you, or will you discard them like a facial tissue which you've blown your nose?
The intent I am trying to show here is that I set up an approach for people to work together in a rather unique system. I believe that this is completely achievable once people understand and join the system.
Maybe in some regard, I set it up, so it wasn't hinged on the fact that I started it. I've never been good at getting groups together. I tried many times to start a band out of high school and college and it just never quite worked out. So the important part to me, was just to make it possible. For the first month, I didn't even care if people even looked at the webpage or not. The vanity of the thing would make me unhappy.
We can accomplish happiness by getting rid of things that make us anything but happy or by addressing the issues that cause us to not feel happiness.
That is pretty much the only thing I have to say as a part of this entry, because to me, it literally is the most important thing.
Are you happy?
With intent, I set upon achieving one simple little goal that should be a part of every single organization in existence.
That one goal is to make sure people are happy.
Happy's a pretty big goal. I think if you give people happiness that it in turn makes you happy just from their happiness.
I've been reading "The Children of The Law of One" by John Peniel. If you've ever studied Edgar Cayce's readings, you've probably heard about this guy.
Anyway, I am getting to the part where it talks about intent and happiness and achieving enlightenment.
The statement says basically that once you've achieved enlightenment you pretty much spend the rest of the time helping others to achieve it.
Now I KNOW I am not fully enlightened. I have frustration that meets me in some form every day. Whether it is my work, or the fact that I sense spirits who can't properly communicate me, I am frustrated.
At times I feel like Prometheus trying to steal fire from Zeus. I want to know what the little secret is, and then turn it around and give it to others.
This is not all that far from one's whose enlightened, but in some regard I would have to be happy about it all.
Sometimes I would say that I am not happy. It's not an "incredible hulk" kind of unhappy, just a "bridge is out" kind of state of upset.
I mean, what are you going to do with things out of your control? You going to let those things eat at you, or will you discard them like a facial tissue which you've blown your nose?
The intent I am trying to show here is that I set up an approach for people to work together in a rather unique system. I believe that this is completely achievable once people understand and join the system.
Maybe in some regard, I set it up, so it wasn't hinged on the fact that I started it. I've never been good at getting groups together. I tried many times to start a band out of high school and college and it just never quite worked out. So the important part to me, was just to make it possible. For the first month, I didn't even care if people even looked at the webpage or not. The vanity of the thing would make me unhappy.
We can accomplish happiness by getting rid of things that make us anything but happy or by addressing the issues that cause us to not feel happiness.
That is pretty much the only thing I have to say as a part of this entry, because to me, it literally is the most important thing.
Are you happy?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)